Re: [PATCH] ftrace: don't increment @pos in g_start()
From: Li Zefan
Date: Sun Jun 21 2009 - 20:43:34 EST
Li Zefan wrote:
> Liming Wang wrote:
>> how about this one?
>>
>
> Yeah, this should work, and cleaner than my version.
>
Hmmm, the patch is cleaner in diffstat but the resulted code
isn't..
After yours:
text data bss dec hex filename
14879 5480 4240 24599 6017 kernel/trace/ftrace.o
After mine:
text data bss dec hex filename
14873 5480 4240 24593 6011 kernel/trace/ftrace.o
>> It's wrong to increment @pos in g_start(). It causes some entries
>> lost when reading set_graph_function, if the output of the file
>> is large than PAGE_SIZE.
>>
>> [ Impact: fix missing entries when reading set_graph_function ]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Liming Wang <liming.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 14 +++++---------
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> index 134e580..1beaac6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> @@ -2495,29 +2495,25 @@ static void *
>> g_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>> {
>> unsigned long *array = m->private;
>> - int index = *pos;
>>
>> - (*pos)++;
>> + if (v)
>> + (*pos)++;
>>
>> - if (index >= ftrace_graph_count)
>> + if (*pos >= ftrace_graph_count)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - return &array[index];
>> + return &array[*pos];
>> }
>>
>> static void *g_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>> {
>> - void *p = NULL;
>> -
>> mutex_lock(&graph_lock);
>>
>> /* Nothing, tell g_show to print all functions are enabled */
>> if (!ftrace_graph_count && !*pos)
>> return (void *)1;
>>
>> - p = g_next(m, p, pos);
>> -
>> - return p;
>> + return g_next(m, NULL, pos);
>> }
>>
>> static void g_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/