Re: [patch 3/6] ide: always kill the whole request on error

From: David Miller
Date: Wed Jun 24 2009 - 02:49:58 EST


From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:49:32 +0200

> On Wednesday 24 June 2009 01:19:04 David Miller wrote:
>> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:27:27 +0200
>>
>> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Subject: [PATCH] ide: always kill the whole request on error
>> >
>> > * Use blk_rq_bytes() instead of obsolete ide_rq_bytes() in ide_kill_rq()
>> > and ide_floppy_do_request() for failed requests.
>> > [ bugfix part ]
>> >
>> > * Use blk_rq_bytes() instead of obsolete ide_rq_bytes() in ide_do_devset()
>> > and ide_complete_drive_reset(). Then remove ide_rq_bytes().
>> > [ cleanup part ]
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > 'cleanup part' tested, limited testing with 'bugfix part'
>> > (using simulated failures of disk fs requests)
>>
>> Considering this alongsize patch #2, it even more begs the
>> question as to why special requests on floppy and tape were
>> handled differently. And that 'error <= 0' test, strange.
>
> TBH I fail to see how it relates to changes present in _this_ patch
> as no change in _this_ patch affects special tape/floppy requests..

The previous patch is a prerequesite for this one. So we should
discuss them as a whole. Because if we can't remove the "ide/floppy
RQ error 0 instead of -EIO" bit, then we don't make these further
consolidations either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/