Re: NMI watchdog + NOHZ question
From: David Miller
Date: Wed Jun 24 2009 - 06:59:26 EST
From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:52:23 +0200
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:32:33AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:23:25 +0200
>>
>> >> And similarly to sparc64, if that 5+ second qla2xxx interrupt
>> >> sequence happens after the tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() call
>> >> we can run into the same situation.
>> >
>> > Yes it would be probably safer to do the tick disabling with
>> > interrupts off already.
>>
>> That only makes sense if you're really putting the cpu to sleep
>> until an interrupt or similar happens.
>
> That is what the idle loop is supposed to do, isn't it?
Some sparc64 cpu's don't have a yield, and therefore can't
truly "sleep" during this loop. That's what I'm talking
about.
>> > These days NMI watchdog is not used much on x86 anymore because it's
>> > default off, so probably people never noticed that.
>>
>> I really didn't want to provide the feature that way on sparc64 which
>> is why I made it on by default. It would be interesting to reconsider
>> x86's default, perhaps even only on a trial basis in -next.
>
> The reason it was turned off is that there are a few systems (e.g.
> laptops from a particular vendor) which don't handle NMIs correctly
> in the platform. When the NMI happens while SMI is active
> they hang. Also there were a few other strange problems
> on other systems that went away when it was disabled.
I wonder how many of those "few other strange problems" were of
the variety I'm diagnosing here :-)
Yes, it's a messy problem to turn on by default on x86 then.
Is this realm of systems-with-NMI-issues exclusive to x86-32
or would it be more doable to turn it on by default for 64-bit
x86 builds?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/