Re: devpts mounts too slowly

[Al Viro]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 01:51:25PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > hm, OK.
> > 
> > I've now mounted 15000 devpts's and still no slowdown is evident.
> 
> I ran my test script, mounting ramfs, with n=100000, and well, gave up
> since it hadn't gotten any further than 57000 or so overnight.  At that
> time each individual mount was taking several seconds.
> 
> Graphing the delays seem to indicate O(n^2) behavior.
> 
> umounts do not appear affected; each umount still take negible time.

I think I know what's going on.  /sbin/mount is linked against libselinux
/sbin/umount is not.  And FPOS in question blows if you
	* do not have selinuxfs mounted (e.g. because selinux is not enabled)
	* have a lot of mounts.

What happens is that this piece of crap checks for presence of selinuxfs
on /selinux; then, if the thing isn't there, we go and scan the entire
/proc/mounts in search of selinuxfs mounts.

If akpm has selinux enabled on his testbox and you don't have it on yours,
we have all observations explained.  I'd expect similar slowdown from
ls on an empty directory, BTW - /bin/ls is linked against the same thing,
so it gets hit as well.  Before it even gets to main().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/