Re: upcoming kerneloops.org item: get_page_from_freelist
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Jun 24 2009 - 18:07:40 EST
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > If the caller gets oom-killed, the allocation attempt fails. Callers need
> > > to handle that.
> >
> > I actually disagree. I think we should just admit that we can always free
> > up enough space to get a few pages, in order to then oom-kill things.
>
> Btw, if you want to change the WARN_ON() to warn when you're in the
> "allocate in order to free memory" recursive case, then I'd have no issues
> with that.
>
> In fact, in that case it probably shouldn't even be conditional on the
> order.
>
> So a
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE((p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) && (gfpmask & __GFP_NOFAIL));
>
> actually makes tons of sense.
I suspect that warning will trigger.
alloc_pages
-> ...
-> pageout
-> ...
-> get_request
-> blk_alloc_request
-> elv_set_request
-> cfq_set_request
-> cfq_get_queue
-> cfq_find_alloc_queue
-> kmem_cache_alloc_node(__GFP_NOFAIL)
-> Jens
How much this can happen in practice I don't know, but it looks bad.
> There are other cases where __GFP_NOFAIL doesn't make sense too, and that
> could be warned about. The __GFP_NORETRY thing was already mentioned.
> Similarly, !__GFP_WAIT doesn't work with __GFP_NOFAIL - because the nofail
> obviously relies on being able to do something about the failure case.
>
> We might want to also have rules like "in order to have NOFAIL, you need
> to allow IO and FS accesses".
Sure, that's sane.
fs/jbd/journal.c: new_bh = alloc_buffer_head(GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
But that isn't :(
> So I don't mind warnings with __GFP_NOFAIL. I just think they should be
> relevant, and make sense. The "order > 0" one is neither.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/