Re: [RFC/PATCH] Winbond CIR driver for the WPCD376I chip (ACPI/PNP id WEC1022)

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:46:01 -0700
David HÃrdeman <david@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, June 25, 2009 00:13, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:36:45 -0700
> > David HÃrdeman <david@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> I've written a driver for the
> ...
> >> Winbond WPCD376I chipset
> >
> > Yay, glad I could get these released for you.  I just did a quick
> > scan of the driver (notes below)
> 
> Two more things that Intel could provide:
> 
> a) Publish the datasheet (I know you mentioned doing this but
>    I can't find it on the Intel website)

Ah I was hoping that had been done already; I'll ping the docs people
about it.

> b) Make the hardware needed to actually use the CIR functionality
>    available for purchase. http://www.easy-cir.com seems to be more
>    or less dead (which is curious since an ad for the website
>    seems to be included with every CIR-enabled Intel motherboard).
>    I had to solder my own IR receiver in order to write the driver.

Oh that might be harder.  We just provide the boards for OEMs and
resellers; often not made directly for end users...

> >> Where should this driver go in the tree? drivers/platform/x86/?
> >
> > drivers/char is probably fine.
> 
> I'm leaning towards drivers/input/misc now...

Seems ok too.

> > The key up/down timeout handling seems like a pretty general
> > problem, maybe the input layer has some helpers for it?  Dunno.
> 
> drivers/media/common/ir-functions.c is the closest thing I could find
> while writing the driver. The functions there aren't usable because
> they do not properly implement the toggle/repeat handling and it
> forces the use of a small, fixed-size keymap. The same problem
> existed when I improved the IR functionality in
> drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget-ci.c by the way, so a generic version
> could probably be added to ir-functions in the future.

Sounds good.

> > Are these just for debugging?  If so, you could put them in debugfs
> > instead...
> 
> No, they are there to help the user when generating a keymap for an
> unknown remote. Press key on remote, read value from
> /sys/.../last_scancode, add line saying "0x12345678 = KEY_EXPLODE" to
> keymap file, repeat...there aren't any user-friendly tools for this
> yet though.

Ah right, yeah that's a good use for sysfs.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/