Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun Jun 28 2009 - 05:00:18 EST
> >> > Ah now the write protection is a "needed feature", in your previous
> >> > comment you talked about why not use ext2/3.......
> >> >
> >> > Marco
> >> >
> >>
> >> Just for your information I tried the same test with pc in a virtual machine with 32MB of RAM:
> >>
> >> Version 1.03e ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> >> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> >> Machine Size:chnk K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> >> hostname 15M:1k 14156 99 128779 100 92240 100 11669 100 166242 99 80058 82
> >> ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> >> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> >> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> >> 4 2842 99 133506 104 45088 101 2787 99 79581 101 58212 102
> >>
> >> These data are the proof of the importance of the environment, workload and so on when we talk
> >> about benchmark. Your consideration are really superficial.
> >
> > Unfortunately, your numbers are meaningless.
>
> I don't think so.
>
> > (PCs should have cca 3GB/sec RAM transfer rates; and you demosstrated
> > cca 166MB/sec read rate; disk is 80MB/sec, so that's too slow. If you
> > want to prove your filesystem the filesystem is reasonably fast,
> > compare it with ext2 on ramdisk.)
> >
> This is the point. I don't want compare it with ext2 from performance
> point of view. This comparison makes no sense for me. I've done this
> test to prove that if you change environment you can change in a
> purposeful way the results.
Yes, IOW you demonstrated that the numbers are machine-dependend and
really meaningless.
ext2 comparison would tell you how much pramfs sucks (or not).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/