Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: adding memory barrier to the poll and receivecallbacks

[Davide Libenzi]

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Jiri Olsa wrote:

> my thinking was that both variants will endup in the same code anyway,
> so it'd be probably better if the more readable (subjective) got in..
> 
> however I dont have any strong preffering feelings about either of those choices,
> so I can convert easilly :)

Please use the existing poll_wait() then, as there's no reason to add 
another API.


- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/