[PATCH -tip 2/3] kprobes: no need to unlock kprobe_insn_mutex
From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Tue Jun 30 2009 - 17:05:35 EST
Remove needless kprobe_insn_mutex unlocking during safety check in garbage
collection, because if someone releases a dirty slot during safety check
(which ensures other cpus doesn't execute all dirty slots), the safety check
must be fail. So, we need to hold the mutex while checking safety.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 6 +-----
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index c0fa54b..16b5739 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -237,13 +237,9 @@ static int __kprobes collect_garbage_slots(void)
{
struct kprobe_insn_page *kip;
struct hlist_node *pos, *next;
- int safety;
/* Ensure no-one is preepmted on the garbages */
- mutex_unlock(&kprobe_insn_mutex);
- safety = check_safety();
- mutex_lock(&kprobe_insn_mutex);
- if (safety != 0)
+ if (check_safety())
return -EAGAIN;
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(kip, pos, next, &kprobe_insn_pages, hlist) {
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/