Re: [BUG 2.6.31-rc1] HIGHMEM64G causes hang in PCI init on 32-bitx86
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Tue Jun 30 2009 - 17:51:24 EST
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> agreed, that is why we change round_up to take u64.
>>>>
>>> round_up() is a macro, it doesn't "take" anything per se...
>>>
>> i mean
>> end = roundup(start, ram_alignment(start)) - 1;
>>
>> static u64 ram_alignment(u64 pos)
>>
>> and other calling to round_up
>>
>
> This is fixing the wrong problem. Fixing round_up is the right thing,
> not working around its brain damage.
>
this one ?
or you want to move round_up/down to include/linux/kernel.h?
[PATCH] x86: add boundary check for 32bit res before expand e820 resource to alignment -v3
fix hang with HIGHMEM_64G and 32bit resource.
according to hpa and Linus, use (resource_size_t)-1 to fend off big ranges.
analyized by hpa
v2: use roundup instead
v3: from HPA update round_up with __type_of__
Reported-and-tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -1367,9 +1367,9 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources(void)
}
/* How much should we pad RAM ending depending on where it is? */
-static unsigned long ram_alignment(resource_size_t pos)
+static u64 ram_alignment(u64 pos)
{
- unsigned long mb = pos >> 20;
+ u64 mb = pos >> 20;
/* To 64kB in the first megabyte */
if (!mb)
@@ -1383,6 +1383,8 @@ static unsigned long ram_alignment(resou
return 32*1024*1024;
}
+#define MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE ((resource_size_t)-1)
+
void __init e820_reserve_resources_late(void)
{
int i;
@@ -1400,17 +1402,19 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources_late(
* avoid stolen RAM:
*/
for (i = 0; i < e820.nr_map; i++) {
- struct e820entry *entry = &e820_saved.map[i];
- resource_size_t start, end;
+ struct e820entry *entry = &e820.map[i];
+ u64 start, end;
if (entry->type != E820_RAM)
continue;
start = entry->addr + entry->size;
- end = round_up(start, ram_alignment(start));
- if (start == end)
+ end = round_up(start, ram_alignment(start)) - 1;
+ if (end > MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE)
+ end = MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE;
+ if (start > end)
continue;
- reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start,
- end - 1, "RAM buffer");
+ reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start, end,
+ "RAM buffer");
}
}
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ extern int reboot_force;
long do_arch_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long addr);
-#define round_up(x, y) (((x) + (y) - 1) & ~((y) - 1))
-#define round_down(x, y) ((x) & ~((y) - 1))
+#define round_up(x, y) ({ __typeof__(x) __mask = (y)-1; \
+ ((x)+__mask) & ~__mask; })
+#define round_down(x, y) ({ __typeof__(x) __mask = (y)-1; (x) & ~__mask; })
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PROTO_H */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/