Re: PROPOSAL: extend pipe() to support NULL argument.

[Amerigo Wang]

On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:04:02PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Amerigo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>Are you familiar with splice() and tee()? They both use pipes as kernel buffers.
>>
>> You are not answering the question, obviously.
>When you use pipes as kernel buffer handlers, two fd isn't necessary.
>Using one will save half of fd resources. Is it obviously?

Not really.. I can't see any reason why you use this method to save
fd's... pick read(2)/write(2).

>
>>
>> And you snipped too much, how can you return that fd? Using the return value?
>one RW file descriptor is returned. I have answered this in the first post.

No, you never say *how* it is returned.

>
>> Ah! This will probably break the user-space program...
>>
>I don't think so. As a skillful programmer, who will trasfter pipe() a
>NULL pointer? In any way, it is break sth, but not very seriously, and
>won't affact any right and robust program.

Huh? Isn't the code sample below too common?

if (pipe(...))
   perror("pipe");

Currently pipe(2) can make sure this is robust.

You are trying to break it...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/