RE: [RFC] transcendent memory for Linux

[Dan Magenheimer]

OK, OK, I give up.  I will ensure all code for shared pools
is removed from the next version of the patch.

Though for future reference, I am interested in what
problems it has other than "just" security (offlist
if you want).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@xxxxxx]
> 
> > > Yeah, a shared namespace of accessible objects is an entirely 
> > > new thing
> > > in the Xen universe.  I would also drop Xen support until 
> > > there's a good
> > > security story about how they can be used.
> > 
> > While I agree that the security is not bulletproof, I wonder
> > if this position might be a bit extreme.  Certainly, the NSA
> > should not turn on tmem in a cluster, but that doesn't mean that
> > nobody should be allowed to.  I really suspect that there are
> 
> This has more problems than "just" security, and yes, security should
> be really solved at design time...
> 								
> 			Pavel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/