Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX] cgroups: fix pid namespace bug
From: Paul Menage
Date: Thu Jul 02 2009 - 12:26:55 EST
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Li Zefan<lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The bug was introduced by commit cc31edceee04a7b87f2be48f9489ebb72d264844
> ("cgroups: convert tasks file to use a seq_file with shared pid array").
>
> We cache a pid array for all threads that are opening the same "tasks"
> file, but the pids in the array are always from the namespace of the
> last process that opened the file, so all other threads will read pids
> from that namespace instead of their own namespaces.
>
> To fix it, we maintain a list of pid arrays, which is keyed by pid_ns.
> The list will be of length 1 at most time.
>
> Reported-by: Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Idea-by: Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/cgroup.h | 11 ++----
> kernel/cgroup.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> index 665fa70..20411d2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> @@ -179,14 +179,11 @@ struct cgroup {
> */
> struct list_head release_list;
>
> - /* pids_mutex protects the fields below */
> + /* pids_mutex protects pids_list and cached pid arrays. */
> struct rw_semaphore pids_mutex;
> - /* Array of process ids in the cgroup */
> - pid_t *tasks_pids;
> - /* How many files are using the current tasks_pids array */
> - int pids_use_count;
> - /* Length of the current tasks_pids array */
> - int pids_length;
> +
> + /* Linked list of struct cgroup_pids */
> + struct list_head pids_list;
>
> /* For RCU-protected deletion */
> struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 3737a68..13dddb4 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> #include <linux/hash.h>
> #include <linux/namei.h>
> #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> +#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
>
> @@ -960,6 +961,7 @@ static void init_cgroup_housekeeping(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cgrp->children);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cgrp->css_sets);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cgrp->release_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cgrp->pids_list);
> init_rwsem(&cgrp->pids_mutex);
> }
> static void init_cgroup_root(struct cgroupfs_root *root)
> @@ -2201,12 +2203,30 @@ err:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Cache pids for all threads in the same pid namespace that are
> + * opening the same "tasks" file.
> + */
> +struct cgroup_pids {
> + /* The node in cgrp->pids_list */
> + struct list_head list;
> + /* The cgroup those pids belong to */
> + struct cgroup *cgrp;
> + /* The namepsace those pids belong to */
> + struct pid_namespace *pid_ns;
> + /* Array of process ids in the cgroup */
> + pid_t *tasks_pids;
> + /* How many files are using the this tasks_pids array */
> + int pids_use_count;
> + /* Length of the current tasks_pids array */
> + int pids_length;
> +};
Maybe lose the unnecessary "pids" suffices and prefixes in this structure?
>
> @@ -2324,6 +2352,8 @@ static struct file_operations cgroup_tasks_operations = {
> static int cgroup_tasks_open(struct inode *unused, struct file *file)
> {
> struct cgroup *cgrp = __d_cgrp(file->f_dentry->d_parent);
> + struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
> + struct cgroup_pids *cp;
> pid_t *pidarray;
> int npids;
> int retval;
> @@ -2350,20 +2380,36 @@ static int cgroup_tasks_open(struct inode *unused, struct file *file)
> * array if necessary
> */
> down_write(&cgrp->pids_mutex);
> - kfree(cgrp->tasks_pids);
> - cgrp->tasks_pids = pidarray;
> - cgrp->pids_length = npids;
> - cgrp->pids_use_count++;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(cp, &cgrp->pids_list, list) {
> + if (pid_ns == cp->pid_ns)
> + goto found;
> + }
> +
> + cp = kzalloc(sizeof(*cp), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cp) {
> + up_write(&cgrp->pids_mutex);
> + kfree(pidarray);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + cp->cgrp = cgrp;
> + cp->pid_ns = pid_ns;
You're storing an uncounted reference to the pid ns here - there's no
guarantee that the pid_ns will outlive the open file.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/