Re: [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardwarevectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >  Performance counter stats for '/usr/bin/rhythmbox /home/jaswinder/Music/singhiskinng.mp3':
> > 
> >        17552264  vec-adds                  (scaled from 66.28%)
> >        19715258  vec-muls                  (scaled from 66.63%)
> >        15862733  vec-divs                  (scaled from 66.82%)
> >     23735187095  vec-idle-cycles           (scaled from 66.89%)
> >        11353159  vec-stall-cycles          (scaled from 66.90%)
> >        36628571  vec-ops                   (scaled from 66.48%)
> 
> Is stall-cycles equivalent to busy-cycles? 


hmm, normally we can use these terms interchangeably. But they can be
different some times.

busy means it is already executing some instructions so it will not take
another instruction.

stall can be busy(executing) or non-executing may be it is waiting for
some operands due to cache miss.


> I.e. do we have this 
> general relationship to the cycle event:
> 
> 	cycles = vec-stall-cycles + vec-idle-cycles
> 
> ?

This patch is already big enough, having 206 lines. Do you want
everything in this patch ;-)

Or we can do these things later on.

Thanks,
--
JSR

http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/