Re: >10% performance degradation since 2.6.18

[Andi Kleen]

> for networking, especially for incoming data such as new connections,
> that isn't the case.. that's more or less randomly (well hash based)
> distributed.

Ok. Still binding them all to a single CPU all is quite dumb. It
makes MSI-X quite useless and probably even harmful.

We don't default to socket power saving for normal scheduling either, 
but only when you specify a special knob. I don't see why interrupts
should be different.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/