Re: >10% performance degradation since 2.6.18

[Andi Kleen]

> That seems to presume it is impossible to reprogram the NIC RX queue 
> selection rules?
> 
> If you can add a new 'flow' to a NIC hardware RX queue, surely you can 
> imagine a remove + add operation for a migrated 'flow'...  and thus, at 
> least on the NIC hardware level, flows can follow processes.

The standard on modern NIC hardware is stateless hashing: as in you
don't program in flows, but the hardware just uses a fixed hash
to map the header to a rx queue. You can't really significantly influence
the hash on a per flow basis there (in theory you could chose
specific local port numbers, but you can't do that for the remote
ports or for well known sockets)

There are a few highend NICs that optionally support arbitary flow matching,
but it typically only supports a very limited number of flows
(so you need some fallback anyways) and of course it would
be costly to reprogram the NIC on every socket state change.

-Andi
-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/