Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic

[Alan Cox]

On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:07:34 +0200
Michael Guntsche <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On Jul 6, 2009, at 19:17, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > This is the more drastic way of doing it. I had hoped to put this  
> > off but
> > in fact it cleans stuff up enormously. This has had only basic testing
> > but the underlying idea is to simply remove all the pty special casing
> > that causes messes in the first place.
> <snip>
> 
> Hi Alan,
> 
> Must commit a6540f731d506d9e82444cf0020e716613d4c46c still be reverted  
> with your patch or can it stay in?

Herbert is (as usual ;)) correct that it should be reverted.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/