[PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP
From: Thomas Renninger
Date: Thu Jul 09 2009 - 04:43:56 EST
Or like that:
Either all #ifdef CONFIG_SMP related conditionals to managed cpus
should vanish or all should be covered. This one takes the latter
approach.
---
'managed_policy' is used for the non-smp case in line 941.
Make the symlink code conditional to #ifdef CONFIG_SMP as already
done at other places.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
Index: cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- cpufreq.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* symlink affected CPUs */
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
if (j == cpu)
@@ -947,6 +948,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
goto err_out_unregister;
}
}
+#endif
policy->governor = NULL; /* to assure that the starting sequence is
* run in cpufreq_set_policy */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/