Re: [PATCH v5] RO/NX protection for loadable kernel modules

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:33:29 -0700
Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > 
> > 105 is also a sign that you picked a somewhat suboptimal config...
> > that's of course your choice but it's a choice that has a small
> > price, if you don't want to pay that price, changing the config to
> > not be entirely insane is a good answer as well ;-)
> 
> But this is the "common" case in the world of Linux where the distros
> are forced to build everything as modules. 

who's holding the stick?
Really.

I've seen some of these case, where the distro kernel has something as
a module, but the other parts of the distro the unconditionally load
that module always. That makes no sense.
If you have 105 different real devices in your system, that have
different drivers, sure, I'll buy 105. Somehow I doubt Rusty's box has
105 ;)



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/