Re: [patch 0/8] 2.6.27.27-stable review
From: Stefan Richter
Date: Sat Jul 18 2009 - 04:35:37 EST
Ozkan Sezer wrote:
You may want to review this:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/3/36
.. and its follow-up:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/3/294
.. and this old one (can't believe it's still there) :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/3/463
Well, why don't /you/ review these issues? (Are these bugs which meet
the criteria enumerated in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? Is
there a fix in mainline which can be taken over as-is or in similar form
for 2.6.x.y?)
If the answer to both is yes, submit patches as described in
stable_kernel_rules.txt.
If you are not quite sure about the criteria, discuss the bugs and their
fixes with the respective maintainers who should know them well enough
to judge whether they are -stable material.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= -=== =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/