Re: implementing Futex

[Michael Schnell]

Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> It sounds like this would be an optional feature of the FPGA code,
> and therefore I'd still suggest implementing option A with a compile-time
> choice so you don't need to have it. 

Yep that is the plan.

If the custom instruction is not provided either the "common area" trick
is used or (worse of course) the pthread_mutex calls fall back to use an
OS based mutex instead of a FUTEX.


>>  If so
>>  in that code sequence we are in "System Mode".
> 
> Yes.


Great !

Thus supposedly, as of Kernel 2.6.31, We don't need modifications in the
Kernel at all for NIOS supporting FUTEX. Only the user land library
needs to be tweaked.

OK, if we decide to use the "Common Area for atomic functions" trick, we
do need to create same in the Kernel startup code and enhance interrupt
return code appropriately. But I suppose we can borrow most of this from
the  Blackfin or sh implementation.

-Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/