Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree

[Felix Blyakher]

On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in
> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h between commit
> bc990f5cb424cdca9dda866785d088e2c2110ecc ("xfs: fix locking in
> xfs_iget_cache_hit") from Linus' tree and commit
> 370f048214b4e9aa2102fa3c454ae1374da287c5 ("xfs: add more statics &  
> drop
> some unused functions") from the xfs tree.

Sorry, I didn't realize that there is a merge between linux-next,
which uses the xfs master tree, and the Linus' tree.

> Just context changes (add/remove). I fixed it up (see below) and can
> carry the fix as necessary.

Thanks for the fix, but there is no need to carrying it separately
from the xfs master tree. I merged the bc990f5 commit back into the
the master tree, and fixed all conflicts (there was another one in
fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c). I planned to do it anyway for 2.6.32.

Thanks,
Felix

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> diff --cc fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> index 5912060,23e7e7e..0000000
> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> @@@ -48,8 -48,6 +48,7 @@@ int xfs_reclaim_inode(struct xfs_inode
>  int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int mode);
>
>  void xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> +void __xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_perag *pag, struct  
> xfs_inode *ip);
> - void xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>  void __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct  
> xfs_perag *pag,
>  				struct xfs_inode *ip);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/