Re: [PATCH 1/8] Revert commit8827c288feb7810185aa7c2e37537202fc709869

From: Matt Helsley
Date: Thu Aug 20 2009 - 00:41:14 EST


On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:13:59PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Li Zefan<lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > As you said, the 2 patches differ just in using different var/func
> > names, so rebasing shouldn't be hard but maybe a bit boring.
> >
>
> Yes - it's a fair amount of work for no real gain.

So this revert won't introduce a regression for any potential tests?

Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/