On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 14:13 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:After looking at ps auxZ
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 10:41 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:But removing the id file from events/ftrace/ might break some ftrace
No, it does do the right thing. Your patch breaks things because not all@@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ event_create_dir(struct ftrace_event_call *call, struct dentrWe do an extra check on ->profile_enable, shouldn't cause bug..
entry = trace_create_file("enable", 0644, call->dir, call,
enable);
- if (call->id)
+ if (call->id&& call->profile_enable)
entry = trace_create_file("id", 0444, call->dir, call,Any way, I don't think this commit does the right thing:
id);
- If CONFIG_EVENT_PROFILE=y, we'll create events/<dir>/<event>/id,
except events/ftrace/<event>/id.
- if CONFIG_EVENT_PROFILE=n, there's no 'id' file at all!
I think it's better to skip ftrace/ dir in perf tool code, instead of
skipping creating id files in ftrace code.
tracepoints are created through TRACE_EVENT() and will thus not have
their profile_enable/disable hooks set.
By giving them an ID file, there is no way to distinguish good from bad
tracepoints.
binary parsers?
And this commit makes 'id' file disapeared with CONFIG_EVENT_PROFILE=n.
I introduced the id file for EVENT_PROFILE, tough luck if someone else
relies on it.
Expempting ftrace is no solid solution, suppose someone else does aAgree.
TRACE_EVENT_FORMAT() tracepoint, how would you know you could use it as
a profile event source?
The id files really must stay conditional.I don't think it's a good idea to connect it with perfcounter
this way. Wouldn't adding a 'profilable' file more intuitive?
its called: id ;-)