Re: [PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix cpu_coregroup_mask to return correctcpumask on multi-node processors

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:46 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> The correct mask that describes core-siblings of an processor
> is topology_core_cpumask. See topology adapation patches, especially
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124964999608179


argh, violence, murder kill.. this is the worst possible hack and you're
extending it :/

> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index f797214..f39bb2c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
>  	 * And for power savings, we return cpu_core_map
>  	 */
>  	if (sched_mc_power_savings || sched_smt_power_savings)
> -		return cpu_core_mask(cpu);
> +		return topology_core_cpumask(cpu);
>  	else
>  		return c->llc_shared_map;
>  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/