Re: [PATCH 0/2] eventfd: new EFD_STATE flag

[Davide Libenzi]

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> Yes, we don't want that. The best thing is to try to restate the problem
> in a way that is generic, and then either solve or best use existing
> solution. Right?
> 
> I thought I had that, but apparently not.  The reason I'm Cc-ing you is
> not to try and spam you until you give up and accept the patch, it's
> hoping that you see the pattern behind our usage, and help generalize
> it.
> 
> If I understand it correctly, you believe this is not possible and so
> any solution will have to be in KVM? Or maybe I didn't state the problem
> clearly enough and should restate it?

Please do.



- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/