Fwd: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER
From: Raz
Date: Tue Aug 25 2009 - 18:33:14 EST
There are other disturbances other than interrupts.
attached is a first draft for the 11-th real time conference ,( If it
would be accepted ).
tar zxvf offsched.tgz
cd paper
make
kpdf offsched.pdf.
thank you
raz
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:03 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > > I asked the questions I did out of pure curiosity, and that curiosity
> > > has been satisfied. It's not that I find it useless or whatnot (or that
> > > my opinion matters to anyone but me;). I personally find the concept of
> > > injecting an RTOS into a general purpose OS with no isolation to be
> > > alien. Intriguing, but very very alien.
> >
> > Well lets work on the isolation piece then. We could run a regular process
> > on the RT cpu and switch back when OS services are needed?
>
> If there were isolation, that would make it much less alien to _me_.
> Isolation would kinda destroy the reason it was written though. RT
> application/OS is injected into the network stack, which is kinda cool,
> but makes the hairs on my neck stand up.
>
> -Mike
>
Attachment:
offsched.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data