Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: set QUEUE_ORDERED_DRAIN by default

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/27/2009 01:43 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Are you claiming qcow2 is unusual?  I can believe snapshot is less common,
> > > though I use it all the time.
> > >
> > > You'd normally have to add a feature for something like this.  I don't
> > > think this is different.
> > >        
> > Why do we need to add a feature for this?
> >      
> Because cache=writeback should *not* lie to the guest?
>
>    

No, it should.

There are two possible semantics to cache=writeback:

- simulate a drive with a huge write cache; use fsync() to implement 
barriers
- tell the host that we aren't interested in data integrity, lie to the 
guest to get best performance

The first semantic is not very useful; guests don't expect huge write 
caches so you can't be sure of your integrity guarantees, and it's 
slower than cache=none due to double caching and extra copies.  The 
second semantic is not useful for production, but is very useful for 
testing out things where you aren't worries about host crashes and 
you're usually rebooting the guest very often (you can't rely on guest 
caches, so you want the host to cache).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/