Re: [PATCH 2/4]: CPUIDLE: Introduce architecture independentcpuidle_pm_idle in drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 08:48 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
> > {
> >       .........
> >       .........
> >       cpuidle_pm_idle = cpuidle_idle_call;
> > }
> 
> All I'm seeing here is a frigging mess.
> 
> How on earths can something called: cpuidle_install_idle_handler() have
> a void argument, _WHAT_ handler is it going to install?

Argh, now I see, it installs itself as the platform idle handler.

so cpuidle_install_idle_handler() pokes at the unmanaged pm_idle pointer
to make cpuidle take control.

On module load it does:

 pm_idle_old = pm_idle;

then in the actual idle loop it does:

        if (!dev || !dev->enabled) {
                if (pm_idle_old)
                        pm_idle_old();

who is to say that the pointer stored at module init time is still
around at that time?

So cpuidle recognised the pm_idle stuff was a flaky, but instead of
fixing it, they build a whole new layer on top of it. Brilliant.

/me goes mark this whole thread read, I've got enough things to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/