Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/1] hrtimers: Cache next hrtimer
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Aug 28 2009 - 14:19:35 EST
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Avg startup time 26.4 (10 runs) same as last run.
>
> total_calls is again equal to cache_hits ... Its been a while since I wrote my
> patch. I'll need to look deeper to see if I've done something more. B)
> Just to make sure, I ran my patch again, I clearly see cache_hits is always
> less than total_calls.
Hmm. I'd really like to know why that's behaving different.
Usually there are only timers in the CLOCK_MONOTONIC base during
boot. CLOCK_REALTIME base should be empty most of the time. If my
theory is correct then the number of reprogram events is correct as
well because base[MONOTONIC]->first is always the one which armed the
timer.
Can you add some debug which tells us to which base the removed timer
belongs ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/