Re: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 29 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson writes:
>  > Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
>  >  > On Thursday 27 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>  >  > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:34:53 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>  >  > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>  >  > > > from 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>  >  > > > (either way).
>  >  > > > 
>  >  > > > 
>  >  > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14015
>  >  > > > Subject		: pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
>  >  > > > Submitter	: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>
>  >  > > > Date		: 2009-08-14 23:41 (12 days old)
>  >  > > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125029329805643&w=3D4
>  >  > > 
>  >  > > Not fixed. With 2.6.31-rc7 I'm still seeing repeatable testsuite
>  >  > > failures on powerpc64. Reverting to 2.6.30 makes the failures go away.
>  >  > 
>  >  > Thanks for the update.
>  >  > 
>  >  > I guess 2.6.31-rc8 doesn't make any difference, does it?
>  > 
>  > I've scheduled a number of gcc bootstraps and testsuite runs
>  > with -rc8 on x86, powerpc64, and arm. I'll post an update in
>  > a day or so.
> 
> 2.6.31-rc8 results in bogus testsuite failures on all three platforms.

That may be a result of the known inotify borkage in -rc8 that has been fixed
in the current Linus' tree.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/