Re: [PATCH] tracing: remove mentioning of legacy latency_tracefile from documentation

[Albin Tonnerre]

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:19:38PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote :
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:50:35PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> >  # tracer: irqsoff
> > @@ -382,7 +374,7 @@ The above is mostly meaningful for kernel developers.
> >  
> >    time: This differs from the trace file output. The trace file output
> >  	includes an absolute timestamp. The timestamp used by the
> > -	latency_trace file is relative to the start of the trace.
> > +	trace file is relative to the start of the trace.
> 
> 
> Not only is it wrong, but the sentence is now completely antithetic.

Oops. this wasn't meant to be there. I'll fix that.

Regards,
-- 
Albin Tonnerre, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development,
consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/