Re: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks andmeasurements

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:41:51 +0300
> >It shows similar curves and behavior to the 8-core results i posted 
> >- BFS is slower than mainline in virtually every measurement. The 
> >ratios are different for different parts of the graphs - but the 
> >trend is similar.
> 
> Dude, not cool.
> 
> 1. Quad HT is not the same as a 4-core desktop, you're doing it with
> 8 cores 

4 cores, 8 threads. Which is basically the standard desktop cpu going
forward... (4 cores already is today, 8 threads is that any day now)



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/