Re: [boot crash] Re: [tip:timers/core] clocksource: Resolve cpuhotplug dead lock with TSC unstable

[john stultz]

On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 20:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > i tried to bisect it but it's inconclusive:
> > 
> >  # bad:  [32beef9c] Merge branch 'perfcounters/core'
> >  # bad:  [b6413360] manual merge of x86/platform
> >  # bad:  [d9e5f39a] Merge branch 'auto-oprofile-next' into auto-latest
> >  # bad:  [cbaff272] Merge branch 'auto-timers-next' into auto-latest
> > 
> > as the bisection comes up with that merge commit. Perhaps the 
> > combination of the x86/platform changes and the clocksource 
> > changes triggered it?
> 
> That seems to be the case - i just tested a combination merge of 
> tip:auto-timers-next and tip:auto-x86-next and the result crashed in 
> a similar way too.
> 
> Since normal bisection cannot find such breakages, i did a topical 
> bisection (merging the finegrained tip:x86/* topics into the timer 
> tree gradually and testing each merge).
> 
> That way i could exclude: x86/platform, x86/pat, x86/asm, x86/apic, 
> x86/percpu, x86/cpu, x86/mm and arrived to x86/tsc - which contains 
> a single commit:
> 
>   d3b8f88: x86: Make tsc=reliable override boot time stability checks
> 
> Reverting that commit from tip:master gives me a non-crashing 
> bootup.

Huh. Does dropping the last chunk of the patch make the issue go away?

I'm suspecting fixing the bug Thomas noticed in the tsc_unstable
assignment (we set tsc_unstable before calling mark_tsc_unstable,
causing the TSC rating to not change) that I included in this patch is
colliding with the clocksource rework from Martin.

Although I'm not sure I see that in the backtrace, so I'm likely wrong.
Hrmm..

-john




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/