Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2
From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Tue Sep 22 2009 - 06:21:25 EST
Hi Mel,
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 11:05 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> I'm going to punt the decision on this one to Pekka or Nick. My feeling
> is leave it enabled for NUMA so it can be identified if it gets fixed
> for some other reason - e.g. the stalls are due to a per-cpu problem as
> stated by Sachin and SLQB happens to exasperate the problem.
Can I have a tested patch that uses MAX_NUMNODES to allocate the
structs, please? We can convert SLQB over to per-cpu allocator if the
memoryless node issue is resolved.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/