Re: [git patches] libata updates

From: Jung-Ik (John) Lee
Date: Mon Sep 28 2009 - 16:20:45 EST

Next message: Theodore Tso: "Re: hard lockup, followed by ext4_lookup: deleted inodereferenced: 524788"
Previous message: Helge Deller: "Re: What's in parisc-2.6.git"
In reply to: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [git patches] libata updates"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [git patches] libata updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 September 2009 04:36:13 Jung-Ik (John) Lee wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 17 September 2009 22:49:35 Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Bug fixes, and a new driver.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
>> >> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus
>> >>
>> >> to receive the following updates:
>> >>
>> >> drivers/ata/Kconfig | 9 +
>> >> drivers/ata/Makefile | 1 +
>> >> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 4 +-
>> >> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 4 +-
>> >> drivers/ata/pata_amd.c | 3 +
>> >> drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 548 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> drivers/ata/sata_promise.c | 155 +++++++++++--
>> >> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 +
>> >> 8 files changed, 704 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> >>
>> >> John(Jung-Ik) Lee (1):
>> >> libata: Add pata_atp867x driver for Artop/Acard ATP867X controllers
>> >
>> > That was really fast.. Not necessarily a bad thing but this driver would
>> > benefit from few polishing touches..
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..7990de9
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * pata_atp867x.c - ARTOP 867X 64bit 4-channel UDMA133 ATA controller driver
>> >> + *
>> >> + * (C) 2009 Google Inc. John(Jung-Ik) Lee <jilee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Per Atp867 data sheet rev 1.2, Acard.
>> >> + * Based in part on early ide code from
>> >> + * 2003-2004 by Eric Uhrhane, Google, Inc.
>> >> + *
>> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> >> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> >> + * (at your option) any later version.
>> >> + *
>> >> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> >> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> >> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> >> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> >> + *
>> >> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> >> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>> >> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
>> >> + *
>> >> + *
>> >> + * TODO:
>> >> + * 1. RAID features [comparison, XOR, striping, mirroring, etc.]
>> >> + */
>> >> +
>> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> >> +#include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/libata.h>
>> >> +
>> >> +#define DRV_NAME "pata_atp867x"
>> >> +#define DRV_VERSION "0.7.5"
>> >> +
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * IO Registers
>> >> + * Note that all runtime hot priv ports are cached in ap private_data
>> >> + */
>> >> +
>> >> +enum {
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_CHANNEL_OFFSET = 0x10,
>> >> +
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * IO Register Bitfields
>> >> + */
>> >> +
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_ACTIVE_SHIFT = 4,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_RECOVER_SHIFT = 0,
>> >> +
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_SHIFT = 0,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK = 0x07,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_SHIFT = 4,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_MASK = 0x70,
>> >> +
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_6 = 0x07,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_5 = 0x06,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_4 = 0x05,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_3 = 0x04,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_2 = 0x03,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_1 = 0x02,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_0 = 0x01,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_DISABLE = 0x00,
>> >> +
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_SYS_INFO_66MHZ = 0x04,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_SYS_INFO_SLOW_UDMA5 = 0x02,
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_SYS_MASK_RESERVED = (~0xf1),
>> >> +
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTSPD_VAL = 0x1143,
>> >> + ATP867X_PREREAD_VAL = 0x0200,
>> >> +
>> >> + ATP867X_NUM_PORTS = 4,
>> >> + ATP867X_BAR_IOBASE = 0,
>> >> + ATP867X_BAR_ROMBASE = 6,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IOBASE(ap) ((ap)->host->iomap[0])
>> >> +#define ATP867X_SYS_INFO(ap) (0x3F + ATP867X_IOBASE(ap))
>> >> +
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE(ap, port) (0x00 + ATP867X_IOBASE(ap) + \
>> >> + (port) * ATP867X_IO_CHANNEL_OFFSET)
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_DMABASE(ap, port) (0x40 + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_STATUS(ap, port) (0x07 + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_ALTSTATUS(ap, port) (0x0E + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * hot priv ports
>> >> + */
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_MSTRPIOSPD(ap, port) (0x08 + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMABASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_SLAVPIOSPD(ap, port) (0x09 + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMABASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_8BPIOSPD(ap, port) (0x0A + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMABASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE(ap, port) (0x0B + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMABASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_PORTSPD(ap, port) (0x4A + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_PREREAD(ap, port) (0x4C + \
>> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
>> >> +
>> >> +struct atp867x_priv {
>> >> + void __iomem *dma_mode;
>> >> + void __iomem *mstr_piospd;
>> >> + void __iomem *slave_piospd;
>> >> + void __iomem *eightb_piospd;
>> >> + int pci66mhz;
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static inline u8 atp867x_speed_to_mode(u8 speed)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return speed - XFER_UDMA_0 + 1;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void atp867x_set_dmamode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
>> >> + struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
>> >> + u8 speed = adev->dma_mode;
>> >> + u8 b;
>> >> + u8 mode;
>> >> +
>> >> + mode = atp867x_speed_to_mode(speed);
>> >
>> > The driver currently doesn't support MWDMA modes but claims otherwise
>> > (fixed in the attached patch).
>> >
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * Doc 6.6.9: decrease the udma mode value by 1 for safer UDMA speed
>> >> + * on 66MHz bus
>> >> + * rev-A: UDMA_1~4 (5, 6 no change)
>> >> + * rev-B: all UDMA modes
>> >> + * UDMA_0 stays not to disable UDMA
>> >> + */
>> >> + if (dp->pci66mhz && mode > ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_0 &&
>> >> + (pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP867B ||
>> >> + mode < ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_5))
>> >> + mode--;
>> >> +
>> >> + b = ioread8(dp->dma_mode);
>> >> + if (adev->devno & 1) {
>> >> + b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_MASK) |
>> >> + (mode << ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_SHIFT);
>> >> + } else {
>> >> + b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK) |
>> >> + (mode << ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_SHIFT);
>> >> + }
>> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
>> >> +{
>> >> + unsigned char clocks = clk;
>> >> +
>> >> + switch (clocks) {
>> >> + case 0:
>> >> + clocks = 1;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 1 ... 7:
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 8 ... 12:
>> >> + clocks = 7;
>> >
>> > Shouldn't "clocks = 0" (the default case) be used here?
>>
>> The clocks value 0 sets it to 8 clocks, while value 7 sets to 12 clocks.
>
> This would explain it but then there is no need to use "clocks = 7"
> for the _input_ "clocks == 7".
>
>> I cleaned up a bit on clocks_shift. See the patch below.
>>
>> > Otherwise it seems to result in underclocked timings for dp->pci66mhz == 0.
>> >
>> >> + break;
>> >> + default:
>> >> + printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: active %dclk is invalid. "
>> >> + "Using default 8clk.\n", clk);
>> >> + clocks = 0; /* 8 clk */
>> >> + break;
>> >> + }
>> >> + return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_ACTIVE_SHIFT;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
>> >> +{
>> >> + unsigned char clocks = clk;
>> >> +
>> >> + switch (clocks) {
>> >> + case 0:
>> >> + clocks = 1;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 1 ... 11:
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 12:
>> >> + clocks = 0;
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case 13: case 14:
>> >> + --clocks;
>> >> + break;
>> >
>> > Is "clocks == 14" a reserved setting?
>>
>> 12 is reserved for the default (== 0), and 13, 14 are set to value 12,
>> 13 respectively.
>
> I meant the _output_ "clocks == 14" here.
>
>> >
>> > If so a comment documenting it would be appreciated.
>>
>> Sure. see the new patch below.
>>
>> >
>> >> + case 15:
>> >> + break;
>> >> + default:
>> >> + printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: recover %dclk is invalid. "
>> >> + "Using default 15clk.\n", clk);
>> >> + clocks = 0; /* 12 clk */
>> >
>> > Shouldn't it use "clocks == 15" setting?
>> It was a typo. 12 is the right default.
>>
>> >
>> >> + break;
>> >> + }
>> >> + return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_RECOVER_SHIFT;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct ata_device *peer = ata_dev_pair(adev);
>> >> + struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
>> >> + u8 speed = adev->pio_mode;
>> >> + struct ata_timing t, p;
>> >> + int T, UT;
>> >> + u8 b;
>> >> +
>> >> + T = 1000000000 / 33333;
>> >> + UT = T / 4;
>> >> +
>> >> + ata_timing_compute(adev, speed, &t, T, UT);
>> >> + if (peer && peer->pio_mode) {
>> >> + ata_timing_compute(peer, peer->pio_mode, &p, T, UT);
>> >> + ata_timing_merge(&p, &t, &t, ATA_TIMING_8BIT);
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + b = ioread8(dp->dma_mode);
>> >> + if (adev->devno & 1)
>> >> + b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_MASK);
>> >> + else
>> >> + b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK);
>> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
>> >> +
>> >> + b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(t.active) |
>> >> + atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
>> >> + if (dp->pci66mhz)
>> >> + b += 0x10;
>> >
>> > What is the purpose of the above hack?
>>
>> For safe PIO mode according to spec.
>>
>> >
>> > AFAICS (I don't have a datasheet) it may result in invalid active
>> > clocks being used for t.active > 12 and 0x80 bit being set incorrectly
>> > for t.active values 7..12 (unless it was the purpose of the hack).
>>
>> See the patch below..
>>
>> >
>> >> + if (adev->devno & 1)
>> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->slave_piospd);
>> >> + else
>> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->mstr_piospd);
>> >> +
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * use the same value for comand timing as for PIO timimg
>> >> + */
>> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->eightb_piospd);
>> >
>> > This is incorrect if slave/master devices use different PIO modes
>> > or if PIO mode <= 2 is used by any device.
>> >
>> > Timing based on t.act8b and t.rec8b values should be used instead.
>>
>> act8b and rec8b have the same values as active, recovery of the port.
>
> Please take a look at drivers/ata/libata-core.c::ata_timing[] table:
>
> ...
> { XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 0, 600, 0 },
> { XFER_PIO_1, 50, 290, 93, 383, 125, 100, 0, 383, 0 },
> { XFER_PIO_2, 30, 290, 40, 330, 100, 90, 0, 240, 0 },
> { XFER_PIO_3, 30, 80, 70, 180, 80, 70, 0, 180, 0 },
> { XFER_PIO_4, 25, 70, 25, 120, 70, 25, 0, 120, 0 },
> { XFER_PIO_5, 15, 65, 25, 100, 65, 25, 0, 100, 0 },
> { XFER_PIO_6, 10, 55, 20, 80, 55, 20, 0, 80, 0 },
> ...
>
> For PIO modes <= 2 (or if master/slave devices use different PIO modes)
> we'll have different values, i.e. for PIO2 in case of a single device on
> the port using standard timings we'll have:
>
> t.active = 4
> t.recovery = 4
> t.act8b = 10
> t.rec8b = 2
>
> Most likely we won't see much use of this driver with older devices,
> however this should not stop us from supporting them and at the same
> time making the driver easier to maintain.
>
>> If a:r=3:1 then they become 4:1 on 66mhz for safer transfer, and
>> a8:r8=3:1, which is identical but the a8 should be incremented by 1.
>> I can use a8:r8 with 66mhz fixup but it becomes the same as using a:r.
>> Take a look at the patch below.
>>
>> >
>> > On the somehow related note:
>> >
>> > * I don't see how PIO0-2 command timings can be met with only 3 bits
>> > used for active clocks. Could it be that dp->eight_piospd should be
>> > programmed in a slightly different way than dp->{mstr,slave}_piospd?
>> >
>>
>> See new patch on clocks_shift below.
>>
>> > * The controller allows higher clocks values for recovery timings but
>> > ata_timing_compute() tries to fairly increase both recovery and active
>> > timings to meet the required cycle timing.
>> >
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int atp867x_cable_detect(struct ata_port *ap)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return ATA_CBL_PATA40_SHORT;
>> >> +}
>> >
>> > As noticed by Robert and Alan already:
>> >
>> > This should use ATA_CBL_PATA_UNK and rely on the driver-side cable detection.
>>
>> I modified cable_detect() to use override; on a certain
>> subsystem_vendor|device, its 40short, others, unknown.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > One last thing: Power Management support is missing from this driver
>> > (I tried addressing this in the separately posted patch but it needs
>> > testing by somebody with the hardware).
>> >
>> >
>> > MWDMA fix:
>> >
>> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Subject: [PATCH] pata_atp867x: fix it to not claim MWDMA support
>> >
>> > MWDMA modes are not supported by this driver currently.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 10 +---------
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> > @@ -118,20 +118,13 @@ struct atp867x_priv {
>> > int pci66mhz;
>> > };
>> >
>> > -static inline u8 atp867x_speed_to_mode(u8 speed)
>> > -{
>> > - return speed - XFER_UDMA_0 + 1;
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > static void atp867x_set_dmamode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
>> > {
>> > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
>> > struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
>> > u8 speed = adev->dma_mode;
>> > u8 b;
>> > - u8 mode;
>> > -
>> > - mode = atp867x_speed_to_mode(speed);
>> > + u8 mode = speed - XFER_UDMA_0 + 1;
>> >
>> > /*
>> > * Doc 6.6.9: decrease the udma mode value by 1 for safer UDMA speed
>> > @@ -471,7 +464,6 @@ static int atp867x_init_one(struct pci_d
>> > static const struct ata_port_info info_867x = {
>> > .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS,
>> > .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
>> > - .mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA2,
>>
>> This looks good to me. thx.
>>
>> > .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
>> > .port_ops = &atp867x_ops,
>> > };
>> >
>>
>>
>> From: John(Jung-Ik) Lee <jilee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> clarifications in timings calculations and cable detection
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John(Jung-Ik) Lee <jilee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> pata_atp867x.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 files changed, 37 insertions, 13 deletions
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> index e6c4706..c1c691f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
>> @@ -156,8 +156,10 @@ static void atp867x_set_dmamode(struct ata_port
>> *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
>> iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
>> }
>>
>> -static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
>> +static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(struct ata_port *ap,
>> + unsigned int clk)
>> {
>> + struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
>> unsigned char clocks = clk;
>>
>> switch (clocks) {
>> @@ -166,15 +168,25 @@ static int
>> atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
>> break;
>> case 1 ... 7:
>> break;
>> - case 8 ... 12:
>> + case 9 ... 12:
>> clocks = 7;
>> break;
>> default:
>> printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: active %dclk is invalid. "
>> "Using default 8clk.\n", clk);
>> - clocks = 0; /* 8 clk */
>> - break;
>> + case 8: /* default 8 clk */
>> + clocks = 0;
>> + goto active_clock_shift_done;
>> }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Doc 6.6.9: increase the clock value by 1 for safer PIO speed
>> + * on 66MHz bus
>> + */
>> + if (dp->pci66mhz && clocks < 7)
>> + clocks++;
>> +
>> +active_clock_shift_done:
>> return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_ACTIVE_SHIFT;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -188,20 +200,19 @@ static int
>> atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
>> break;
>> case 1 ... 11:
>> break;
>> - case 12:
>> - clocks = 0;
>> - break;
>> case 13: case 14:
>> - --clocks;
>> + --clocks; /* by the spec */
>> break;
>> case 15:
>> break;
>> default:
>> printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: recover %dclk is invalid. "
>> "Using default 12clk.\n", clk);
>> - clocks = 0; /* 12 clk */
>> + case 12: /* default 12 clk */
>> + clocks = 0;
>> break;
>> }
>> +
>> return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_RECOVER_SHIFT;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -230,10 +241,8 @@ static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct ata_port
>> *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
>> b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK);
>> iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
>>
>> - b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(t.active) |
>> + b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(ap, t.active) |
>> atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
>> - if (dp->pci66mhz)
>> - b += 0x10;
>>
>> if (adev->devno & 1)
>> iowrite8(b, dp->slave_piospd);
>> @@ -246,9 +255,24 @@ static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct ata_port
>> *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
>> iowrite8(b, dp->eightb_piospd);
>> }
>>
>> +static int atp867x_cable_override(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> + if (pdev->subsystem_vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP &&
>> + (pdev->subsystem_device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP867A ||
>> + pdev->subsystem_device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP867B)) {
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int atp867x_cable_detect(struct ata_port *ap)
>> {
>> - return ATA_CBL_PATA40_SHORT;
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
>> +
>> + if (atp867x_cable_override(pdev))
>> + return ATA_CBL_PATA40_SHORT;
>> +
>> + return ATA_CBL_PATA_UNK;
>> }
>>
>> static struct scsi_host_template atp867x_sht = {
>
> Thanks, your patch looks good to me but since there are still some
> leftover issues left we would also need something like the incremental
> patch below:

[resending - bounced back from -ide, -kernel]

your patch below looks good to me.
-John

>
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] pata_atp867x: PIO support fixes
>
> * use 8 clk setting for active clocks == 7 (was 12 clk)
> * use 12 clk setting for active clocks > 12 (was 8 clk)
> * do 66MHz bus fixup before mapping active clocks
> * fix setup of PIO command timings
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> @@ -155,30 +155,31 @@ static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shi
> struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
> unsigned char clocks = clk;
>
> + /*
> + * Doc 6.6.9: increase the clock value by 1 for safer PIO speed
> + * on 66MHz bus
> + */
> + if (dp->pci66mhz)
> + clocks++;
> +
> switch (clocks) {
> case 0:
> clocks = 1;
> break;
> - case 1 ... 7:
> - break;
> - case 9 ... 12:
> - clocks = 7;
> + case 1 ... 6:
> break;
> default:
> printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: active %dclk is invalid. "
> - "Using default 8clk.\n", clk);
> + "Using 12clk.\n", clk);
> + case 9 ... 12:
> + clocks = 7; /* 12 clk */
> + break;
> + case 7:
> case 8: /* default 8 clk */
> clocks = 0;
> goto active_clock_shift_done;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Doc 6.6.9: increase the clock value by 1 for safer PIO speed
> - * on 66MHz bus
> - */
> - if (dp->pci66mhz && clocks < 7)
> - clocks++;
> -
> active_clock_shift_done:
> return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_ACTIVE_SHIFT;
> }
> @@ -193,7 +194,8 @@ static int atp867x_get_recover_clocks_sh
> break;
> case 1 ... 11:
> break;
> - case 13: case 14:
> + case 13:
> + case 14:
> --clocks; /* by the spec */
> break;
> case 15:
> @@ -235,16 +237,16 @@ static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct a
> iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
>
> b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(ap, t.active) |
> - atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
> + atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
>
> if (adev->devno & 1)
> iowrite8(b, dp->slave_piospd);
> else
> iowrite8(b, dp->mstr_piospd);
>
> - /*
> - * use the same value for comand timing as for PIO timimg
> - */
> + b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(ap, t.act8b) |
> + atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.rec8b);
> +
> iowrite8(b, dp->eightb_piospd);
> }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Theodore Tso: "Re: hard lockup, followed by ext4_lookup: deleted inodereferenced: 524788"
Previous message: Helge Deller: "Re: What's in parisc-2.6.git"
In reply to: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [git patches] libata updates"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [git patches] libata updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]