Re: How to handle console devices

[Alan Cox]

> I don't know what the best way is to accomplish this.  Create dummy
> inode and file structs and pass them to the usual tty_open() routine?  
> (But then what about hangup event handling?)  What do you think?

What I long term envisioned was that 

- Every tty (or at least every interesting tty) would have a tty_port
  object for the hardware  [done now for all consoles but vt]
- Every tty port object would have an "output" method
- The tty->termios would move to the tty_port
- The tty receive buffers would move to the tty_port (only needed for a
  console that supports input)

At that point
- The tty lock/refcount isn't needed all the time for the receive data
  paths which speeds it up a fair bit
- A console can be implemented without a tty_struct anywhere in sight
- Flow control and speed setting can be done on hardware generically on
  resume paths

That fixes the lifetime and magic object invention issues that plague the
current console.

I still think that is the right way to fix it.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/