Re: [RFC] move #define pr_fmt KBUILD_MODNAME and KMSG_COMPONENT toMakefiles?
From: Joe Perches
Date: Wed Sep 30 2009 - 10:53:06 EST
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:20 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:54:59 -0700
> Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If something like were added to a module Makefile:
> > ccflags-y += -D "pr_fmt(fmt)=KBUILD_MODNAME \": \" fmt"
>
> Where is the difference between the definition of the macro in the
> source file? It's still one additional line, no?
Look at net/netfilter/ipvs for instance.
It would have been possible to add:
ccflags-y += -D "KMSG_COMPONENT=IPVS"
ccflags-y += -D "pr_fmt(fmt)=KMSG_COMPONENT \": \" fmt"
to net/netfilter/ipvs/Makefile instead of adding it
to 23 files.
Same sort of thing for drivers/s390/char/Makefile,
though it's less beneficial there.
Multiple
CFLAGS_foo.o += -D "KMSG_COMPONENT=foo"
and a single
ccflags-y += -D "pr_fmt(fmt)=KMSG_COMPONENT \": \" fmt"
> And if you are dreaming of converting all source files
> to the pr_fmt mechanism, this is a big effort ..
I think it could be a useful mechanism to define pr_fmt
for individual module Makefiles and there's no rush...
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/