Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Add boundary check on ioctl arguments
From: Hannes Eder
Date: Wed Sep 30 2009 - 11:33:19 EST
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 17:18, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:38:12 +0200
> Hannes Eder <heder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > @@ -2353,17 +2357,25 @@ do_ip_vs_get_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd,
>> > void __user
>> *user, int *len)
>> > {
>> > unsigned char arg[128];
>>
>> can MAX_ARG_LEN be used here?
>
> I am not convinced... it is a different numerical value,
> so it could be an ABI change. Rather not do that in this
> type of patch...
For do_ip_vs_set_ctl MAX_ARG_LEN is used:
static int
do_ip_vs_set_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
{
int ret;
unsigned char arg[MAX_ARG_LEN];
...
I assume that will be fine for do_ip_vs_get_ctl as well.
-Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/