[tip:perf/urgent] perf_event: Fix event group handling in __perf_event_sched_*()
From: tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 03:47:40 EST
Commit-ID: 8c9ed8e14c342ec5e7f27e7e498f62409a10eb29
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8c9ed8e14c342ec5e7f27e7e498f62409a10eb29
Author: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:51:17 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:30:44 +0200
perf_event: Fix event group handling in __perf_event_sched_*()
Paul Mackerras says:
"Actually, looking at this more closely, it has to be a group
leader anyway since it's at the top level of ctx->group_list. In
fact I see four places where we do:
list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->group_list, group_entry) {
if (event == event->group_leader)
...
or the equivalent, three of which appear to have been introduced
by afedadf2 ("perf_counter: Optimize sched in/out of counters")
back in May by Peter Z.
As far as I can see the if () is superfluous in each case (a
singleton event will be a group of 1 and will have its
group_leader pointing to itself)."
[ See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125361238901442&w=2 ]
And Peter Zijlstra points out this is a bugfix:
"The intent was to call event_sched_{in,out}() for single event
groups because that's cheaper than group_sched_{in,out}(),
however..
- as you noticed, I got the condition wrong, it should have read:
list_empty(&event->sibling_list)
- it failed to call group_can_go_on() which deals with ->exclusive.
- it also doesn't call hw_perf_group_sched_in() which might break
power."
[ See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125369523318583&w=2 ]
Changelog v1->v2:
- Fix the title name according to Peter Zijlstra's suggestion
- Remove the comments and WARN_ON_ONCE() as Peter Zijlstra's
suggestion
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <4ABC5A55.7000208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 30 ++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 0f86feb..e50543d 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1030,14 +1030,10 @@ void __perf_event_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
update_context_time(ctx);
perf_disable();
- if (ctx->nr_active) {
- list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->group_list, group_entry) {
- if (event != event->group_leader)
- event_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
- else
- group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
- }
- }
+ if (ctx->nr_active)
+ list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->group_list, group_entry)
+ group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
+
perf_enable();
out:
spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
@@ -1258,12 +1254,8 @@ __perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != cpu)
continue;
- if (event != event->group_leader)
- event_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu);
- else {
- if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, 1))
- group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu);
- }
+ if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, 1))
+ group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu);
/*
* If this pinned group hasn't been scheduled,
@@ -1291,15 +1283,9 @@ __perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != cpu)
continue;
- if (event != event->group_leader) {
- if (event_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu))
+ if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, can_add_hw))
+ if (group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu))
can_add_hw = 0;
- } else {
- if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, can_add_hw)) {
- if (group_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, cpu))
- can_add_hw = 0;
- }
- }
}
perf_enable();
out:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/