Re: [PATCH] perf_event, powerpc: Fix compilation after bigperf_counter rename
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 07:13:20 EST
Hi Ingo,
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:42:01 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:25:55 +1000 Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Give me a day or two, I should be able to add a per-branch setting for
> > > who to send mails to without too much trouble.
> >
> > In the mean time I don't now if someone has pointed you at these today:
> >
> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/12/
>
> That's an upstream warning.
When I sent that to you, I was referring to these build results:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/1307802/
which (as you say) was only a waning in the rest of the kernel but is
turned into an error by the -Werror we use when building arch/powerpc.
The warning came from commit 4765c1db84c73f775eb1822a009117cbae524e9e
("rcu-tiny: The Bloatwatch Edition, v6") in the -tip tree and fixed by
commit 5ef9b8e59c043624fb44e31439cecf7f8b4cd62a ("rcu: Clean up the
warning message about RCU not defined") the next day (in the -tip tree).
So no big problem. Neither of these commits are upstream.
I was just filling in the role of notifying you of build problems until
Michael can automate it.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature