Re: [PATCH 4/5] checkpatch: fix __attribute__ matching

[Daniel Walker]

On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:46 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:

> The problem with the __attribute__ match is that it is impossible to
> sensibly write as a regular-expression as it has nested round brackets
> within it.  I do wonder why we care what is before the equals.  I
> suspect that any assignment ='s followed by a newline, followed by a {
> is wrong.  There are few places that a { is right on the next line.

Yeah, I was thinking about that also .. I though there might be some
"= {" situation I wasn't thinking of tho.

> I'll try that one out and see if it fires any false positives.  Its
> passing my tests here.
> 
> Could you see if the version at the url below works better for you:
> 
>   http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-testing

I'm wondering about your release cycle .. You seem to be selectively
sending patches to Andrew ? Have you considered putting all your changes
into Linux-Next for instance then just keep up with the merge-window
cycle ? Either that or send everything to Andrew.. Either way, you would
have all the changes getting tested, instead of something like above
where is "testing" or a version number at an obscure url location..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/