Re: [stable] [patch 00/48] 2.6.27.32-stable review

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 03:15:15PM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 16.09.2009 23:09 schrieb Greg KH:
> > Can you send me what you need applied to the latest 2.6.27-stable tree
> > to fix this up so we can finally resolve this?
> 
> The patch that should have been applied is here:
> 
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/13845/
> 
> I'm including it below for completeness.
> 
> The patch that was applied to 2.6.27-stable instead is this:
> 
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/20855/
> (commit 221418f9a25cd96aff99d6aba41c177f6eb00853)
> 
> The difference is in blob 5 which inserts the new code at the wrong place.
> I have no idea who or what caused that change.
> 
> So commit 221418f9a25cd96aff99d6aba41c177f6eb00853 should be reverted and
> my original patch below applied instead. The patch by Stefan Bader is
> equivalent to that but additionally backports two pr_err() calls from
> mainline.

I took Stefan's patch as it was simpler.  Let me know if the problem is
still present.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/