Re: [RFC PATCHSET] workqueue: implement concurrency managed workqueue

[Avi Kivity]

On 10/01/2009 06:55 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > For kvm, we don't want to force a specific scheduling class for vcpu
> > threads, so we'd need infrastructure to create a new scheduling class
> > out of an existing one to hook the two callbacks.  Seems like quite a
> > lot of work, for something that is orthogonal to scheduling.
> >
> > Tejun, would preempt notifiers work for your workqueues?  see bottom of
> > include/linux/preempt.h.
> >      
> I considered that but the thing is workqueue needs to know when a
> thread wakes up not when it gets scheduled.  Of course we can add
> another notifier op and call it from try_to_wake_up() but I really
> didn't want to add yet another hook in a very hot path which will only
> be useful for very small number of tasks but yet has to be called for
> every operation and the sched_class mechanism means that we already
> have hooks at all the interesting spots, so I think it's better to
> make use of them instead of adding another set of callbacks.
>    

Right, it's a subtle difference that makes p_n unusable for you.

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/