Re: [stable] [109/136] USB: xhci: Make TRB completion code comparisonreadable.

[David Vrabel]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 05:38:36PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> 2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>>>
>>> ------------------
>>> From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> commit 66d1eebce5cca916e0b08d961690bb01c64751ef upstream.
>>>
>>> Use trb_comp_code instead of getting the completion code from the transfer
>>> event every time.
>> Are all these xhci patches really candidates for the stable tree?  XHCI
>> support is marked as EXPERIMENTAL, the xhci standard is still at the
>> draft stage, and I don't believe there are any xhci products available
>> on the market yet.
> 
> Did you read the 000/136 message where I explained why I was accepting
> all of these xhci patches into the -stable tree?

I have now, sorry.  It just seemed odd that XHCI patches where added to
stable releases whilst essential WHCI patches don't even make it into
the current rc tree.

David
-- 
David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers
CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park,  Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562
Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ                 http://www.csr.com/


Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/