Re: [RFC PATCH] perf_core: provide a kernel-internal interface toget to performance counters

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 10:53 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'd suggest you extend perf events with a 'system 
> wide' event abstraction, which:
> 
>  - Enumerates such registered events (via a list)
> 
>  - Adds a CPU hotplug handler (which clones those events over to a new
>    CPU and directs it back to the ring-buffer of the existing event(s)
>    [if any])
> 
>  - Plus a state field that allows the filtering out of stray/premature
>    events.
> 
> Such an add-on layer/abstraction would sure be useful in other cases as 
> well. It might make sense to expose it to user-space and make perf top 
> use it by default.

Non-trivial.

Something like this would imply a single output channel for all these
CPUs, and we've already seen that stuffing too many CPUs down one such
channel (using -M) leads to significant performance issues.

Therefore I would strongly argue to let the kernel interface be what it
is and solve this in a userspace library for those who care.

We really cannot sanely support an all-CPUs abstraction without running
into trouble.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/