Re: [PATCH] x86: Generate cmpxchg build failures

From: Maciej Åenczykowski
Date: Mon Oct 05 2009 - 14:53:16 EST

Next message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: clock_nanosleep: cyclic POSIX thread freezes during timesetting"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] x86: use near online node instead of round bin for numa"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH] x86: Generate cmpxchg build failures"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] x86: Generate cmpxchg build failures"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Strictly speaking isn't there a cmpxchg8b on newer than ancient cpus...

I'm guessing that it's deliberately not supported/used?

Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: clock_nanosleep: cyclic POSIX thread freezes during timesetting"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] x86: use near online node instead of round bin for numa"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH] x86: Generate cmpxchg build failures"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] x86: Generate cmpxchg build failures"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]