RE: linux-next: mfd tree build failure

[Haojian Zhuang]

Hi Stephen,

Thanks a lot for your help. I fix it now. Please help to review it. It's already passed the build test.

Best Regards
Haojian

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 2009年10月6日 11:54 AM
To: Haojian Zhuang
Cc: Samuel Ortiz; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mark Brown
Subject: Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure

Hi Haojian,

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:35:05 -0700 Haojian Zhuang <hzhuang1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Could you send your .config file to me? The 88pm8607 patch is just for mfd-2.6 git tree. I didn't try it in linux-next git tree before. I can try it now. If I could have your .config file, it would be better.

I am sorry, but I don't have the exact .config file any more (I have
moved on in my creation of linux-next)  however, as I said, this was an
allmodconfig build on x86_64.  I also noted that CONFIG_I2C=m and
CONFIG_MFD_CORE=m, while the config entry that controls the building of
this driver is a bool so must have been 'y'.  So from a builtin driver,
you are referring to symbols that are only defined in modules.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: 0002-mfd-fix-the-dependancy-issue-on-88PM8607.patch
Description: 0002-mfd-fix-the-dependancy-issue-on-88PM8607.patch