Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

From: Herlin R. Matos Lastres
Date: Tue Oct 06 2009 - 14:07:17 EST

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [v7 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle powermanagement code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introducecpuidle to POWER."
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [patch v4 0/3] aio: implement request batching [moreperformance numbers]"
In reply to: Joel Becker: "Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Linus Torvalds wrote:

If so, then I don't hate "v2.6.31+", but at the same time, that single plus-sign tells _so_much_ less than v2.6.31-1234-g16123c4 that I think it's really sad and crippled.

I agree with linus, I don't like that (+) simbol in the linux version,
I prefer only numbers.

Herlin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [v7 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle powermanagement code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introducecpuidle to POWER."
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [patch v4 0/3] aio: implement request batching [moreperformance numbers]"
In reply to: Joel Becker: "Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]