Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

[Theodore Tso]

On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:40:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Could we, for consistency's sake, make it:
> 
>  	2.6.32-rc3+00052-g0eca52a-dirty
>  	2.6.32-rc3+
> 
> ? Or do we want to keep the old version string alone for some reason?

I'm a bit concerned that changing from what we've currently had:

>       2.6.29-00052-g0eca52a-dirty

might break some packaging scripts.  I'm also personally used to that
naming scheme; in fact at the moment I'm using
2.6.32-rc1-00292-gb0390e2.  :-)

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/